Showing posts with label Interview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Interview. Show all posts

Friday, August 29, 2014

MA 6th Congressional District Q&A: Seth Moulton (D)

Salem resident Seth Moulton (D) is running for the MA 6th Congressional District seat currently held by incumbent John Tierney. Moulton is an Iraq War veteran who received an Master's in Public Administration (MPA) from the John F. Kennedy School of Government and an MBA from Harvard Business School. 

Here he answers a few education related questions:


The term ‘failing’ has been used a great deal to describe the state of the traditional public education system in this country. Do you believe U.S. schools are ‘failing’?

The vast majority of public schools are providing an excellent education to our children. There are so many wonderful teachers, like many I remember from my grade schooldays, who are inspiring and instructing our young people. My sister is one of these wonderful teachers; she teaches high school history at a Massachusetts public school.Unfortunately, however, there are many schools that are, in fact, failing our kids. Too often, both in the 6th district and across the country, the zip code in which a child is born determines his or her educational opportunities.
To close this opportunity gap, we need more federal and state funding going directly to schools, and accountability amongst teachers and administrators; we need to support our teachers by providing them adequate compensation for their hard work, and we need to diversify our national standards beyond testing metrics. We need to educate the “whole child,” and not just “teach to the test.” Communities with struggling schools must not be ignored or ostracized for their past performance, but must be embraced by the local community and federal government to make for a better educational environment for tomorrow’s students.

While we are not failing across the board, we are also not living up to the high standards of educational equity that we should set for ourselves. 


Proponents of the federal Race to the Top program believe that the competitive grant program will serve as a powerful catalyst for education reform while others criticize its focus on high stakes testing. Are you in support of the Race to the Top program?

I support Race to the Top as a program; I believe that it incentivizes teachers, schools and states to perform at their best. However, I firmly believe that it should not be the only major grant program offered to states by the federal government. In academic communities – both at the local and state level - where students are at a competitive disadvantage already, the answer is not to turn away students, eliminate funding opportunities, or turn to charter schools.

We need to promote answers that empower local leaders to do whatever is best for their school, not just what is best for the test.



One of the criteria for Race to the Top funding is to ensure “conditions for high performing charters and other innovative schools.” What is your opinion of the growing charter school sector? Do charter schools, particularly in urban districts, have a place in U.S. public education?

I believe in letting parents choose what is best for their children. That said, charter schools are not the solution to the opportunity gap that exists in this country. The Harlem Children’s Zone, KIPP, Match Education and others, have provided a valuable service to kids growing up in poverty, but the selectivity and resources necessary to make these schools successful cannot come at the expense of other struggling public schools. We cannot be funneling large amounts of federal dollars and resources to charter schools. Our public school system is the backbone of this nation, and with some effort, thoughtful legislation, significant federal appropriations, and creative thinking, we can close the education gap and turn our entire educational system around.



In part, the Bank on Students Emergency Refinancing Act introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren would allow eligible student loan borrowers to refinance high interest loans down the rates offered to new borrowers under the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act. Do you believe this to be an effective way to deal with the student loan debt situation?

The struggle to afford student loans is very personal to me. At 35 years old, I’m still paying back the loans I took to afford my college education. Allowing students to refinance their high interest student loans is one piece of the puzzle in ensuring students leave school with manageable debt. However, the more fundamental problem is the soaring cost of tuition, which has risen 90% since 1998, on the backs of students and our loans.
 
I believe in providing consumer protections to ensure student loan practices are not usury in nature. Colleges, universities, and the federal government should not be making money off student loan defaults. Meanwhile, limiting the use of student loan financing to go towards only direct educational needs is another way to limit soaring college tuition rates. Solving the student loan crisis will be necessary to ensure our education system helps foster successful generations of American workers in the future as it has in the past.



Part of President Obama’s plan for higher education includes the goal of having the highest proportion of college graduates in the world by the year 2020. Do you believe that this is something the U.S. should specifically be striving toward? Why or why not?

When President Kennedy spoke, in 1961, about sending a man to the moon within the decade, people laughed. Eight years later, we accomplished the feat. As a country, and as a government, having goals is a good thing. By the metrics with which the Western world defines success, high college graduate rates symbolize prosperity. That said, I look at things a bit differently. In today’s world, where student loan debt has hampered a generation, where we have bifurcating narratives for students of lower socioeconomic means and those in the middle and upper classes, we cannot predict what will best suit
future generations. We need to provide access to opportunities for all Americans. Higher education will certainly be one route, but providing viable alternatives must also be a priority.
 
While I will always support those who wish to pursue a college education, we also need to look at empowering vocational schools, community colleges, and other institutions with the funds and tools needed to train and equip workers for a 21st century economy.

____

Moulton is one of five candidates running as a Democratic for the 6th Congressional seat. The primary election held on Tuesday, September 9th will decide who will face Republican Richard Tisei in November's general election. 


For more information on Moulton: 

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

WSC 2013 Q & A: Tracy O'Connell Novick

The Worcester Public School System currently serves nearly 25,000 students in grades Pre-K through 12 in its 45 schools. One of the 10 Commissioner's Districts, WPS has a population that is 44% First Language not English, 73.1% Low Income and 20.7% Special Education. In 2010, the district was designated Level 4 when two of its schools, Chandler Elementary and Union Hill School, became Level 4 schools as determined by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education; Burncoat Street Elementary was added to the Level 4 school list in 2011. On the flip side, Worcester also has seven Level 1 schools including Worcester Technical High School whose principal was just named  the MetLife/NASSP National Principal of the Year, the first ever from the state of Massachusetts.


Tracy O'Connell Novick was elected to the Worcester School Committee in 2009 and is currently running for re-election in this year's municipal race. Here Novick answers a few questions regarding her thoughts about the current state of WPS. 


The Worcester Public School is currently a Level 4 school system. How would you describe the current state of the school system overall in terms of its educational quality and academic performance? Do you think that WPS is ‘failing’ overall?

No, the Worcester Public Schools are certainly not failing overall. That's part of why I find this classification fairly worthless, as it really doesn't give anyone a clear picture on how a school or a district actually is doing. I was at a PTO meeting earlier this week in which the principal mentioned that next month, they'd release the MCAS results; one parent's first question was if the school had gone up a level. The levels, though, tell you so little about what is going on in the buildings or with the students, and that parent--and all parents--have a much better picture on that than either a chart or a number can tell you by going to PTO meetings and by seeing what is happening in their children's classrooms.

There are really amazing things happening in our schools every day. Much like every district, how that works out varies from school to school, but there is great educational quality in Worcester.



As of the last school year, the WPS student population was just over one-third English Language Learner. What sorts of challenges has this presented for the school system? Alternatively, what are some of the positive attributes that immigrant students bring to your student population?

The first place that we've seen that as a challenge is in our budget: we've needed to increase services for ELL students and increase translation services for their families. That makes the budget that much tighter. Because there are so many students who are in the process of learning English, they are in nearly every classroom in the district, as well, which makes us early (and necessary) adopters of training all teachers in reaching those students. We haven't done that yet, but we're working on it.

The amazing breadth of lived experience of our students who come from all over the world from all walks of life and all over the world brings a richness to our system and to our city that can't be replicated. We've also taken advantage of the language diversity to bring dual language immersion to three of our city schools, in which the classes are made up of students, half of whom are native English speakers, half of whom are native Spanish speakers, who spend the day learning half in each language. It's a program that had great success in other cities, and it's very promising here in Worcester.




One striking statistic is the percentage of WPS students with more than 9 unexcused absences (29.2% in 2011-12). Why do you believe this figure to be so high? What are some potential solutions to address the attendance issue? 

You've hit on why Worcester has joined the national attendance initiative, and is working on everything from increasing rates of students walking to school to piloting a program with UMass for students with chronic asthma. There are lots of reasons for the high rate, some due to illness (and some illnesses associated with poverty, like those associated with asthma) and some due to awareness. The awareness is what the current push is around. We've also these past few years finally gotten a nurse in every school (which we did not have for many years), and we are watching for the impact of that as well. Like much in education, it's a mix of causes to be sorted out and dealt with as we can, with community support.



Over the last 5 years, Worcester's student population has increased by nearly 1,900 students. Is overcrowding an issue/concern?

I would say that it is a concern, but not yet an issue. Worcester closed eight schools about a decade ago, and we now have more students than we did when we closed those buildings and consolidated those student bodies into other buildings. This year, we have rented space for the fifth and sixth grade of one elementary school, and I fully expect that we'll see more expansions in the next few years. It is very much on our minds.



Ideally, where would you like to see the Worcester Public School System in 5 years? What are some of the major issues that will need to be confronted in that time frame?  

In the next five years, I'd like to see us build on what we do well and bring back things that we've lost. (I'd also like to see us deal with our space crunch!) 


Elementary librarians were cut over a decade ago, and, while, we've gotten them back part-time in our level 4 schools, it's not nearly enough. Likewise, there is a richness to the curriculum that has faded as NCLB has made too much about math and reading scores. Worcester also had a number of magnet programs running across the city. We've retained a few, but ideally, I would love to see us running more that really expand the options for parents and the education opportunities for kids. I'd also like to see us build on, strengthen, and expand our dual language (English/Spanish) program that we've now got up to grade 4; we haven't yet created the path for those students into middle and high school. 


All of that of course means money, which brings me to the primary thing I'd like to see in five years: I'd like to see the Worcester Public Schools funded by the city at a rate significantly over the minimum required by the foundation budget. 


You might also be interested in: