Showing posts with label MCAS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MCAS. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Lynn Public School District Classified as Making Substantial Progress Toward State Targets

Last year, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) revised its accountability and assistance system to consider additional metrics aside from standardized test scores.

Source: Once Page Overview of Accountability Indicators


As previously noted, schools are no longer classified in Levels 1 through 5 and are instead classified according to the categories below:

Source: One Page Summary of Massachusetts' Accountability System


In 2018, Lynn as a district was classified as 'Not Requiring Assistance or Intervention' and the same was true in 2019. Further, the reason for this year's classification was 'Substantial Progress Towards Targets.' The percentage assigned to Lynn  in 2019 associated with this classification based on the 0 to 100 scale was 64%. When weighted along with last year's percentage, the cumulative target percentage was 56%. 

Source: 2019 Official Accountability Report - Lynn

In looking at the 'points' received for the indicators above, Lynn received 71% of possible points for non-high school grades (78% for the lowest performing students at this grade level) and 47% for high school grades (50% for the lowest performing students). At the high school level, Lynn received 4 out of 4 points for the chronic absenteeism indicator but 0 out of 4 points for the advanced coursework completion indicator.

At the individual school level, three-quarters of the schools in Lynn were considered as either making 'substantial progress toward targets' or 'meeting or exceeding targets.' Three schools were classified as 'Requiring Assistance or Intervention:' Lynn Classical High School, Thurgood Marshall Middle School and Washington Elementary School. 

Saturday, September 29, 2018

Lynn Classified 'Not Requiring Assistance/Intervention' Per State's New Accountability System

As of this school year, Massachusetts has introduced a revised accountability and assistance system and will no longer be categorizing schools into Levels 1 through 5. Instead, schools will classified as follows:

Schools without Required Assistance or Intervention (85% of Schools):

Reasons for this classification include:
  • Schools of Recognition
  • Those 'Meeting Targets'
  • Those 'Partially Meeting Targets'

Schools Requiring Assistance or Intervention (15% of Schools):

Reasons for this classification include schools/districts requiring either: 
  • Focused/Targeted Support
           or
  • Broad/Comprehensive Support
More specifically, the new accountability takes into account indicators not previously factored into the accountability system including chronic absenteeism and advanced coursework completion and will also have an increased focus on "raising the performance of the school's lowest performing students." In addition to the overall classifications referenced above, schools and districts will also be assigned a percentage that combines information about the chosen indicators into a single number between 0 and 100. In order to be classified as "meeting targets" a school or district must have target percentage of 75% or higher.



In order to get a better sense of this new accountability system, let's take a look at the Lynn Public School District. In 2018, Lynn's overall classification was 'not requiring assistance or intervention' with the reason being 'partially meeting targets.' The percentage assigned to Lynn associated with this partial meeting of goals based on the 0 to 100 scale was 45%.




As you can see, each of the indicators is given a point total from 0 to 4 based on the reported data compared to their state determined target. Though there is some variation in the 0 to 2 point range depending on the category, schools that receive a 3 were considered 'on target' and those that received a 4 exceeded their target. Further, each category is weighted differently. For example, 'Achievement' at the non-high school grade level for all students is weighted at 60% while it is weighted 40% for all students at the high school level due to the additional secondary indicators (high school completion). Overall, Lynn's non-high school results were weighted at 70% while the high school results were weighted as 30%. 

For Lynn's 2018 MCAS scores, see here and the district's drop out rates, here. 


Most schools within LPS were also classified as 'not requiring assistance or intervention' with the exception of Classical High School, Fecteau-Leary, and Pickering Middle School.


Classical was classified as such because: 
  • It is among the lowest performing 10% of schools (at the 8th percentile)
  • Low subgroup performance for high needs students
  • Low participation rate for English Language Learners and former English Language Learners
Fecteau-Leary required assistance due to its low participation rate among the student body at large and Pickering reported low subgroup performance among Asian students. In terms of meeting targets, Drewicz, Brickett, Callahan, Cobbet, Ford and Lynn Tech were all reported as 'meeting targets.'

KIPP Academy Lynn, a single school district, was also classified as 'partially meeting targets' with a target percentage of 29%.



While there were a number of Massachusetts districts requiring assistance or intervention, most were in the 'Focused/Targeted Support' category; just three districts were in the 'Broad/Comprehensive Support' category (Lawrence, Holyoke, and Southbridge, the state's previously named Level 5 districts). 

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

State Releases MCAS 2.0 Results

In the Spring 2017, Massachusetts rolled out what is calling the "Next Generation" MCAS exam which was taken by students in grades 3 through 8 (students in grade 10, on the other hand, took the previously designed exam). The Next-Generation MCAS includes aspects of the previous exam as well as items developed by PARCC and items created to assess the state's learning standards. According to the state, the Next-Generation exam was formulated as a method to better assess career/college readiness. Specifically, this was in light of data which indicated that more than a third of the state's public school graduates attending Massachusetts public colleges or universities were placed in remedial courses and that these remedial students often do not graduate on time or at all.

MCAS 2.0 is not without its opponents, however. Monty Neill of the The National Center for Fair and Open Testing notes the new exam is not necessarily an improvement as it blends the previous iteration of the MCAS with the PARCC which is not more predictive of college success. The Pioneer Institute in particular found the writing prompts on the PARCC exam did not elicit the kind of writing expected in college or work environments. Further there is ample research that suggests that standardized test scores are more associated with the test taker's socioeconomic status than aptitude (here here here here here). Moreover, this article points out that for teachers and administrators:
"the data that we collect from MCAS do not generally provide us with new insights about students strengths or weaknesses and it arrives...after we have completed the school year and have new students in front of us."
It goes on to assert that standardized tests are not the best or only way to assess learning using New Hampshire, which has instituted a system in which students are assess through projects and portfolios of content knowledge and skills (Performance Assessment of Competency Education).

On Wednesday, October 18th, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education released the 2017 MCAS results for both the Next-Generation exam as well as the 10th grade 'legacy' exam. The Massachusetts Association of School Committees notes that the new exam is more difficult and that the results will be reflective of this change. The state's education secretary, Jonathan Peyser, said that given that the Next-Generation MCAS is in its first year, the data should be treated differently from how previous results have been treated and that making comparisons would be akin to comparing "apples and oranges." Test results on the new exam range from 440 to 560 and will fall into four levels:
  • Not Meeting Expectations
  • Partially Meeting Expectations
  • Meeting Expectations
  • Exceeding Expectations
For more information from the DESE on the exam, see here.

Lynn

Below are the results for the Lynn Public School District. The percentages represent the proportion of students 'Meeting Expectations' or 'Exceeding Expectations' on the exam.

On the English Language Arts (ELA) exam, 32% of students in grades 3 through 8 either met or exceeded expectations. At the state level, 49% of students in these grades met or exceeded expectations.


There were some differences at the subgroup level with 46% of white students meeting or exceeding expectations compared to 28% of Hispanic students, 27% of Black/African American students, and 39% of Asian students. The results for male and female students were 27% and 39%, respectively. Students with disabilities and English Language Learner students met or exceeded expectations at much lower rates (5% and 6% respectively); this is compared to 13% for both of these subgroups at the state level.


On the math exam, 33% of students in grades 3 through 8 either met or exceeded expectations. At the state level, 48% of students in these grades met or exceeded expectations.



Again, there were racial differences with 48% of white students meeting or exceeding expectations compared to 28% of Hispanic students, 26% of Black/African American students, and 45% of Asian students. The results for male and female students were 31% and 34%, respectively. 


On the 5th grade science exam, which was not a Next-Generation version of the exam, 42% of students were Proficient or Advanced compared to 46% statewide. On the 8th grade exam, 28% were Proficient or Advanced compared to 40% at the state level.


As previously mentioned, 10th grade students took the previous version of the MCAS exam in 2017.



Given the implementation of the new Next-Generation exam and the state's new Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) plan, 2017 is considered a reset year on accountability levels with schools not being assigned a level unless the a school has less than a 90% participation rate on the exam (by grade or subgroup) or schools with both grades 3 through 8 and 9 through 12 may be assigned Level 3 for persistently low graduation rates. Lynn this year does not have an accountability level assigned for 2017.

Finally, demographics should be kept in mind when reviewing the data. During the 2016-17 academic year, the Lynn Public School District enrolled 15,299 students in grades Pre-K through 12. Over half of those students (60.3%) were categorized as Hispanic, 19.9% as English Language Learners and 15.5% as students with disabilities. Additionally, half of LPS students were deemed economically disadvantaged by the state. The average number of absences last year was 10.5. 

All data taken from: www.doe.mass.edu

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Lynn MCAS Results 2015 II

Below are proficiency rates on the 2014 MCAS by school at the elementary level.
 
Positive or negative numbers in parentheses in the 'ALL' field represent the percent change from 2014. All numbers are in percentages.

ELEMENTARY
ABORN


ELA
Math
3
5777
4
6360
5
7454
ALL64 (-3)65 (-9)






BRICKETT


ELA
Math
3
5873
4
4247
5
5557
ALL
51 (+6)59 (+11)






CALLAHAN



ELA
Math
3
3653
4
3951
5
6357
ALL
44 (+5)50 (-3)




COBBET


ELA
Math
3
2747
4
2830
5
4042
ALL
31 (+7)41 (+1)







CONNERY


ELA
Math
3
3871
4
4049
5
5751
ALL
44 (+4)58 (+6)




DREWICZ


ELA
Math
3
4858
4
3421
5
7366
ALL
50 (+8)47 (-3)







FALLON

ELA
Math
3
N/AN/A
4
N/AN/A
5
N/AN/A
6
N/AN/A
ALL
35 (+9)42 (+15)


*Data is not reported for samples sizes less than 10

FORD


ELA
Math
3
3052
4
3434
5
4738
ALL
36 (+6)42 (-4)







HARRINGTON


ELA
Math
3
3345
4
4025
5
4646
ALL
39 (0)40 (+2)







HOOD


ELA
Math
3
3039
4
4033
5
5264
ALL
40 (+6)44 (-2)







INGALLS



ELA
Math
3
1935
4
3140
5
4236
ALL
30 (-4)37 (-1)







LINCOLN-THOMSON


ELA
Math
3
5563
4
4943
5
7070
ALL
58 (+3)58 (+6)



LYNN WOODS


ELA
Math
3
65100
4
6865
5
7275
ALL
68 (-2)78 (+7)


SEWELL ANDERSON


ELA
Math
3
5180
4
5541
5
7058
ALL
59 (+9)56 (-2)



SHOEMAKER


ELA
Math
3
5366
4
5858
5
6350
ALL
59 (0)57 (+6)






SISSON


ELA
Math
3
5886
4
6253
5
7053
ALL
63 (0)64 (0)



TRACY


ELA
Math
3
4583
4
3523
5
7252
ALL
50 (0)53 (+1)







WASHINGTON


ELA
Math
3
4073
4
2018
5
3328
ALL
30 (+9)37 (+6)






MIDDLE
BREED


ELA
Math
6
4131
7
5332
8
5438
ALL
49 (-1)33 (+2)


MARSHALL


ELA
Math
6
4133
7
4625
8
5629
ALL
48 (-1) 29 (+3)







PICKERING


ELA
Math
6
5745
7
6845
8
7162
ALL
65 (-6)51 (+5)








HIGH SCHOOL/SECONDARY

                                  ELA             Math
Lynn Classical81 (+2)54 (-6)
Lynn English77 (-5)57 (-8)
Lynn Tech75 (+1)43 (-7)
Fecteau-Leary43 (-1)15 (+4)





Source: www.doe.mass.edu