9th Essex State Rep Q&A: Jennifer Migliore

In this year's 9th Essex District State Representative race, there are three candidates running to represent an area that includes Precincts 1 and 2 of Ward 1 Lynn, Precincts 1, 2 and 4-9 in Saugus and Precincts 1, 2, 3, and 7 in Wakefield: incumbent Donald Wong (R) and two challengers Saritin Rizzuto (D) and Jennifer Migliore (D).  Saugus native Jennifer Migliore is a 2014 graduate of Wellesley Colllege whose previous experience includes working as an intern for US Senator Elizabeth Warren and more recently for US Congressman Seth Moulton. Migliore has been endorsed by several organizations including the Mass Alliance, North Shore Labor Council and the Massachusetts Teachers Association. Here, she shares her positions on issues related to public K-12 education in Massachusetts. 

As 9th Essex District State Representative, you would be representing an area that includes parts of Lynn and Wakefield as well as the town of Saugus. What is your understanding of the issues facing public education in each of these places? Do you foresee any challenges in representing a district with very different student populations and in turn very different needs?

I am running for State Representative on a platform of opportunity. Without the excellent educational opportunities I had, I would not be the person I am today. I am fighting for ALL students in the 9th Essex District to have access to the highest standards of education the state can offer.

While knocking on doors, I am constantly hearing that folks want stronger schools. Families are worried that their kids are lacking many of the opportunities that higher-achieving districts enjoy. While Wakefield, Saugus, and Lynn are three entirely different communities, the lack of funding for education is a challenge amongst all three. Our schools need more funding; which is why I am such a strong proponent of the Fairshare Amendment, which would increase funding for our schools.  I would like to see funding increases for STEM lab programs, extracurricular activities, and early childhood education.

Much of the discussion around public education at the state level has been regarding the expansion of charter schools. First, what is your position on charters and the push to raise the charter cap? Second, do you think too much focus is being placed on this particular aspect of public K-12 education?

I am not against choice: I chose to go to a private high school.  However, I do not support funding charter schools with public taxpayer dollars to educate a select few. When describing the most effective method for educating our students, I live by the mantra “a rising tide lifts all boats.” Increasing funding for ALL of our public schools will lift all of our educational standards.

I am strongly opposed to lifting the charter school cap. Instead, we must focus on improving public schools. For example,  Saugus Public Schools are currently rated Level 3-- the lowest level assessment for Massachusetts public schools-- and are facing a $500,000 deficit, largely due to the diversion of public school funding to charter schools. Saugus Public Schools are losing a much-needed $1.7 million to charter school reimbursements, and as a result, the education of the children of Saugus is suffering.

That being said, I don’t think there is too much focus being concentrated on this issue-- I’m glad there’s a heightened and spirited debate about charter schools. The main point of contention isn’t about expanding charter schools, but how do we fund education so that ALL students receive a quality education? We need to be more creative and innovative about educational investments.

Aside from charter schools, another major issue in Massachusetts public education is funding. What are your thoughts on the most pressing needs in terms of updating or revising the way that schools are currently funded in the state?

Currently, Chapter 70 is funding public schools in Massachusetts. I view the Chapter 70 formula as detrimental to public education because it is an outdated formula that adversely affects communities such as Saugus and Wakefield. We need a new formula that funds BOTH our gateway cities like Lynn, but also funds our middle of the road communities like Saugus, which is unable to supplement major educational investments through property taxes.

Also, In the 9th Essex District there are major problems associated with how we fund the Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational High School. I am a major proponent of vocational schools. My father is a vocational high school teacher. Nevertheless, the current formula to fund the voke disproportionately affects Saugus.  Saugus, a level three school district, shouldn’t have to spend millions to subsidize other communities that enroll students at Northeast Metro.

Should 'college and career ready' be the standard or goal of K-12 education?

While it is essential that students be ‘college and career ready’ upon completing their K-12 education, it is also important that our children’s social and emotional needs are met as well.  Education must go beyond academics. Our children must learn to think critically and solve problems and be able to adapt readily to new situations and information.

What does the term "quality education" mean to you? What do you believe needs to be done in order to provide that to all students both in the 9th Essex District and statewide?

The term “quality education” is one that is not easily defined. However, the core of any solid education is the perception of value. For all students to obtain a true “quality education”, it is essential that schools foster a sense of worth and importance amongst their students and teachers. This sense of value is not something that can be derived by administering frequent tests or defining students based off scores from these exams-- a practice I am strongly opposed to. Value is created by making sure that students and teachers understand their innate worth.  

We must invest in modernizing school infrastructure, because it serves as a physical reminder that these students are valued, while simultaneously promoting meaningful relationships between students and teachers. One of the most profound classes I have taken was an education policy course at Wellesley. This class highlighted the importance of treating students as human beings, rather than statistics. I will always remember the lessons I have learned in that class, and I will fight to provide that sense of value to all the students in both the 9th Essex District and statewide.

For more information:

• Website: http://www.jenforrep.com/
• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jenmiglioreforrep/?fref=ts
• Twitter: @Jen_Migliore
• Snapchat: JMRunningForYou

The State Primary this year will be held on Thursday, September 8, 2016; the general election is on November 8, 2016. 

Massachusetts Charter School Graduation Rates 2014

Below are the graduation rates for Massachusetts charter schools in 2014. Also listed are the number of students in each charter's graduation cohort (cohorts are not the number of students who graduated but the total group of students who should have graduated from a particular school in a given year). This data takes into account students who either transfer into a school at some point during high school or transfer in. Graduation rates at charters in the state ranged from 5.5% to 100%; cohort samples ranged from 6 students to 185; the average grad rate was 75.8% and cohort size 56.

 

	# in Cohort	Graduation Rate
Abby Kelly Foster	87	97.7%
Academy of the Pacific Rim	34	85.3%
Advanced Math and Science Academy	101	99.0%
Amesbury Academy	6	50.0%
Berkshire Arts and Technology	24	45.8%
Boston Collegiate	36	77.8%
Boston Day and Evening	158	16.5%
Boston Green Academy Horace Mann	68	75.0%
Boston Preparatory	39	66.7%
City on a Hill	49	73.5%
Codman Academy	35	85.7%
Community Charter School of Cambridge	36	80.6%
EMK Academy for Health Careers Horace Mann	46	97.8%
Four Rivers	36	88.9%
Foxborough Regional	61	95.1%
Francis W Parker Charter Essential	67	91.0%
Global Learning	20	95.0%
Hampden Charter School of Science	29	96.6%
Innovation Academy	52	92.3%
Lowell Middlesex Academy	73	5.5%
MA Academy for Math and Science	49	100.0%
Martha's Vineyard Charter	7	57.1%
MATCH Charter	42	66.7%
Mystic Valley Regional	82	96.3%
North Central Charter Essential	41	78.0%
Phoenix Charter Academy	86	15.1%
Pioneer Charter of Science	47	97.9%
Pioneer Valley Performing Arts	68	82.4%
Prospect Hill Academy	60	85.0%
Sabis International	104	98.1%
Salem Academy	35	88.6%
Salem Community Charter	13	7.7%
South Shore Charter	36	94.4%
Sturgis Charter	185	94.4%

Source: http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/gradrates.aspx

11th Essex State Rep Q&A: Brendan Crighton

Lynn Councilor At-Large Brendan Crighton is one of three candidates running for the 11th Essex District State Representative seat vacated by Steven Walsh (D) this January. The 11th Essex consists of Wards 4-3, 5-1, 5-4, 6 and 7 in Lynn as well as the Town of Nahant. 

Background

Brendan Crighton is a lifelong Lynn resident and product of the Lynn Public Schools. He attended Lincoln-Thomson Elementary School, Breed Junior High, and Classical High School before earning his Bachelor’s Degree in Government from Colby College and Master’s Degree in Public Administration from Suffolk University. Crighton was elected to the Lynn City Council in 2010 as Ward 5 Councilor, which he served for two terms before being elected to Councilor-at-Large in 2014. Crighton has worked for State Senator Tom McGee for the past nine years, the last four as his Chief of Staff. In Senator McGee’s office, he has had the opportunity to work on a number of issues including budgetary and legislative matters, Transportation, Labor and Workforce Development, Public Service and Veterans Affairs Committee work, and most importantly, constituent services. Crighton serves on a number of boards including the Gregg House and My Brother’s Table Boards of Directors, as well as an active member of the Lynn Democratic City Committee, North Shore Young Democrats, Friends of Ward 5, Ancient Order of the Hibernians-Division 10, Friends of Lynn Woods, Friendly Knights of St. Patrick, and Friends of Lynn and Nahant Beach. Crighton currently resides in West Lynn with his wife Andrea. 


Here Brendan answers a few education related questions: 

 What is your understanding of the major education related issues facing Lynn? How does this compare to the issues Nahant is facing?

I believe I am uniquely qualified to be a strong advocate for education issues in the 11^th Essex district because of my proven commitment to supporting and strengthening public education during my 9 years working for State Senator Tom McGee and 4.5 years on the Lynn City Council. One major issue facing Lynn is the conditions of the school buildings. I voted to fund the new Marshall Middle School in Lynn and worked hard to make sure it passed a city wide referendum. We need to continue to work with the Massachusetts School Building Authority, and advocate for other Lynn school building upgrades and replacements. Our young people have so much to offer and that is why I started the Lynn Youth Council to give students a voice in their government and to encourage civic participation. Most importantly, I meet regularly with parents and students to hear their ideas on how to improve the public school system based on first hand experiences.

As State Representative, I vow to push for Chapter 70 funding increases so that they continue to be reflective of the student population increases. Two other education related priorities are universal pre-kindergarten and increased after school funding and programming. Children who participate in high-quality early education, develop better language and social skills, test better, and have fewer behavioral problems once they enter school. Currently 80% of children and youth in Massachusetts do not have access to affordable, high quality after school and expanded learning opportunities. I was fortunate enough to be able to take advantage of some of Lynn’s after school programs during my youth, and I believe that every young person should have that same opportunity. Both of these education programs are in high demand and are critical in closing the achievement gap.

In addition to Chapter 70 funding, one of the biggest education issues facing Nahant is reimbursement for circuit breaker special education which has a tremendous impact on their overall budget. For small towns like Nahant, the state needs to provide direct funding for special education to ensure that every student is getting the high quality education services that they deserve.

        

    The current Massachusetts school funding formula was originally developed in 1993. Do you believe the formula to be outdated? In what sense?

As State Representative, I would support legislation to revive the Foundation Budget Review Commission to examine and report on the resources needed for all students to achieve success and identify operating efficiencies that can be made by school districts.

        

    According to the latest Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education reports, there are 1,026 students from Lynn and Nahant that are pre-enrolled in a charter school for school year 2014-15. What is your stance on charter schools? Do they have a place in public education, specifically in Lynn?

I am a proud product of Lynn Public Schools K-12, where I learned so much from the hard working teachers and faculty. I am against raising the cap on charter schools. I do not believe that public tax dollars should be diverted to charter schools because of the adverse impact it has on the students and educators in traditional public schools. Public schools need every dollar of dedicated funding they can get.

      

  In an article titled ‘A fairer test score measure’ Jack Schneider and Massachusetts State Senator Pat Jehlen (D) write: “Standardized test scores, which constitute the lion’s share of how we evaluate school effectiveness, are highly problematic. Standardized tests capture a narrow slice of life in schools and reflect only a fraction of what the public values. …And they are subject to gaming.” What is your opinion on standardized testing and the use of test scores to measure school quality as well as teacher effectiveness?

Though I believe there must be some measurement we use to evaluate our public school system, I have concerns about the use of standardized test scores to primarily measure school quality and teacher effectiveness. Every school district is different and faces unique challenges when it comes to educating students.

Standardized test scores are the tool that is used to measure schools effectiveness, yet it is not always reflective of the progress a student has made year to year. That is why it is important when analyzing our schools’ quality that we don't narrowly focus on test scores for a single year, but rather look at how students have improved year to year. I believe growth model assessments are important in order to comprehend a student’s preparedness and college readiness throughout their school career.

               

  If elected, in what ways will you advocate for better public education for the students and families living the 11^th Essex District?

If elected, I will work hard to make sure our communities get the education and special education funding they deserve, along with access to pre-kindergarten and after school programs. I have already fostered relationships with education advocates and agencies through my legislative and budgetary work in Senator McGee’s office. Just recently, I earned the endorsement of the Massachusetts Teachers Association. The future of our state depends on our hard-working teachers and a strong public school system. Education must always be a top priority and I look forward to working hard to make sure the resources are there for our teachers and students.

Thank you for your time in reading this post. To keep up with the campaign, please check out www.brendancrighton.com, find Brendan Crighton for State Representative on Facebook and Twitter. Also, please feel free to email us at info@brendancrighton.com.

You might also be interested in:

• 11th Essex State Rep
• Councilor At-Large 2013 Q & A: Brendan Crighton

11th Essex District State Rep Q&A: Charlie Gallo

Current Lynn School Committee member Charlie Gallo announced his candidacy for the 11th Essex District State Representative seat vacated by Steven Walsh (D) this January. The 11th Essex consists of Wards 4-3, 5-1, 5-4, 6 and 7 in Lynn as well as the Town of Nahant.

Background:

Charlie Gallo is an attorney and educator who was born and continues to reside in West Lynn. He was elected to the Lynn School Committee in 2011 and re-elected in 2013. Gallo earned his Bachelor’s Degree from Suffolk University in 2005 and his Law Degree in 2009 as an evening student at Suffolk Law School while working during the day. Gallo is employed as an attorney and teaches courses in government as an adjunct instructor at North Shore Community College. He serves on the boards of the Lynn Community Association and Lynn Home for Young Women. Gallo previously served as a member of the Lynn Citizens Advisory Board (2008 – 2012), which reviews grant applications for youth programs, nonprofits, and other community development programs. He also served as an associate member of the Lynn Zoning Board of Appeals (2009 – 2012).  Gallo has volunteered for a number of Democratic political campaigns and has been elected and re-elected as secretary of the Lynn Democratic City Committee since 2004.

Here Charlie answers a few education related questions:

 What is your understanding of the major education related issues facing Lynn? How does this compare to the issues Nahant is facing?

As State Representative, I will prioritize quality public education, including supporting public schools, community colleges, and state universities, as well as advocating for students and educators.  This is because I understand firsthand the importance of a quality education.  I come from a working class West Lynn family and was the first in my family to graduate from college, followed by law school, which I attended at night while working during the day. Shortly thereafter, I returned to the classroom as an adjunct instructor at North Shore Community College.  Elected to the Lynn School Committee in 2011 and re-elected in 2013, my record on public education is strong.

Funding may be the greatest challenge facing the Lynn Public Schools and Johnson Elementary School in Nahant. Without adequate funding, we cannot build or improve schools, ensure smaller class sizes, maintain sufficient numbers of teachers and staff, or provide the programs, services and resources that are needed for a well rounded education

The replacement of outdated schools remains a major educational issue facing the 11th Essex District, and is one that I have been a leader on during my time on the Lynn School Committee.  With parents and educators, I worked on a successful campaign to pass a bond to build a new Marshall Middle School.  I continue to work with the Lynn Teachers Union to advocate for the replacement and repair of outdated school buildings through the Massachusetts School Building Authority.  As State Representative, I would be able to offer not just advocacy, but also legislation, to see to it that outdated schools are repaired and replaced.

Training for jobs also remains a a major educational issue facing the 11th Essex District, and is another issue that I have lead on.  With the North Shore Labor Council, I worked to bring the E-Team machine shop training program back to Lynn Tech in order to train adults and provide skills for them to use in finding employment. The funding for this program is from the state budget and has been cut in the past. As State Representative, it would be a priority of mine to fund this program and others like it.

One of my major long-term goals is in the area of early childhood education. Though challenging to accomplish because of cost and space constraints, it is important that we work to someday make quality all-day pre-kindergarten available to every child.

Presently, as a Lynn School Committee Member, I am fighting for increased funding for the Lynn Public Schools, as the City of Lynn proposes to fall short of its required net school spending amount in its budget for the upcoming fiscal year. This illustrates a stark contrast between my  priorities and the priorities of one of my opponents in this race, Councilor Brendan Crighton.  Earlier this month, the Lynn City Council voted to ask the State Legislature for a pay hike. As State Representative, I would oppose this measure. My opponent, on the other hand, voted to support the pay hike request, including a raise for himself.  He did so at a time when the Lynn Public Schools are being underfunded by millions of dollars, and when public safety, public works, sanitation, veteran services, playgrounds and parks, our public library, and all other city services are being cut.

The current Massachusetts school funding formula was originally developed in 1993. Do you believe the formula to be outdated? In what sense?

I would like to see a Chapter 70 funding formula that provides more state aid for special needs and English Language Learner populations,and districts that offer vocational education.  Special needs and English Language Learner populations have increased since 1993, and vocational education has become more expensive with new technology. Lynn, Nahant, and other municipalities would benefit from this kind of adjustment to the Chapter 70 funding formula.

According to the latest Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education reports, there are 1,026 students from Lynn and Nahant that are pre-enrolled in a charter school for school year 2014-15. What is your stance on charter schools? Do they have a place in public education, specifically in Lynn?

As State Representative, I will be a leader on keeping the cap on charter schools. Though I do not begrudge any parent for the choice that he or she makes for the education of his or her child, I do not believe that public tax dollars should be used in a charter school setting. A fully funded and supported public school system open to all school aged children is essential to the future of the City of Lynn and Town of Nahant. Funding diverted to charter schools detrimentally impacts the students and educators.  This is especially true in Lynn, in light of the cost to educate our large special needs and English Language Learner populations as well as the cost of maintaining a vocational high school.

I have been a leader on this issue during my time on the Lynn School Committee. In 2013, I drafted a strong anti-charter school resolution along with my colleague John Ford and passed it through the Lynn School Committee. To my knowledge, this was the boldest effort of any School Committee in the Commonwealth on the issue of charter schools. Further, I joined colleagues on the Lynn School Committee in speaking in opposition to the proposed Fenix Charter School in Lynn in 2013 and submitted a letter to the Commonwealth in opposition to the establishment of a charter school in neighboring Saugus in 2012. This year, I spoke as part of a panel of public education advocates at an event held by the Boston Teachers Union and Citizens for Public Schools in Boston.

In an article titled ‘A fairer test score measure’ Jack Schneider and Massachusetts State Senator Pat Jehlen (D) write: “Standardized test scores, which constitute the lion’s share of how we evaluate school effectiveness, are highly problematic. Standardized tests capture a narrow slice of life in schools and reflect only a fraction of what the public values. …And they are subject to gaming.” What is your opinion on standardized testing and the use of test scores to measure school quality as well as teacher effectiveness?

I have serious concerns about the use of standardized test scores to measure school quality and teacher effectiveness. Differences from district to district and, in some cases, school to school, in terms of technology, professional development opportunities, classroom sizes, demographics, and socio-economics make it both unreliable and unfair to use standardized test scores as the primary measure of school quality and teacher effectiveness.

Moreover, I am seriously concerned also about over-testing our students and over-burdening our educators with standardized tests. Teaching to the test can cause districts to drop foreign language, civics, arts and music programs, which I believe are essential for a well rounded education.  It also can make it difficult for teachers to be creative in their lesson plans.  In 2014 as a Lynn School Committee Member, I passed a motion to establish a study committee to include, among others, teachers, which will report back to the Lynn School Committee regarding PARCC.

If elected, in what ways will you advocate for better public education for the students and families living the 11th Essex District?

As State Representative, I will advocate for additional state funding to support the Lynn and Nahant school districts, including funding to replace outdated schools, provide job skills and vocational training, and institute universal all-day pre-kindergarten.  I will work to keep public higher education tuition and fees down at North Shore Community College, Salem State University, UMASS, and our other community colleges and state universities. I will also support a more well rounded approach towards education policy that favors teaching over standardized testing and encourages education in vocational trades, foreign languages, civics, the arts, and music. Additionally, I will be careful not to over-burden educators or school districts with unreasonable mandates that all too often shift the focus away from students’ educational needs.

As State Representative, I will continue my practice of having regular personal interactions with parents, teachers, students, and community members.  I will continue returning phone calls, responding to emails and social media, and being available to meet face to face.  I will also continue personally visiting schools throughout the district, and attending many school and community events.  Finally, I will use my position to be an advocate for the reputations of our students and schools, which is important for our students’ future employers and educational institutions.  As a School Committee Member, I have publicized the good that comes out of our schools by calling in stories to local newspapers and using social media.  I will continue to do so as State Representative.

Thank you for your time in reading this post. To keep up with the campaign, please check out www.CharlieGallo.com, find Charlie Gallo for State Representative on Facebook, and follow GalloForRep on Twitter and Instagram. Please also feel free to email Charlie@CharlieGallo.com or call 781-592-9498 with ideas, questions, comments, or concerns.

Some Districts, Schools Reporting High Suspension Rates for Students with Disabilities

Here we looked at the new student discipline regulations expected to be enacted into law starting on July 1, 2014. There is particular concern regarding suspension rates in regard to students with disabilities. According to published reports, the Department of Education found that students with disabilities, particularly black children with disabilities, were nearly twice as likely to be suspended as non-disabled students. 

In Massachusetts there are some districts that suspended students with disabilities at disproportionate rates. Below are the districts with the ten highest suspension rates for students with disabilities during the 2012-13 school year. Statewide, the out-of-school suspension rate was 4.3%.

 *The Spirit of Knowledge Charter School voted to surrender its charter on October 29, 2013.

Below are the top ten individual schools with the highest out-of-suspension rates for students with disabilities.

Roxbury Preparatory Charter had the highest suspension rate in this category at both the district and individual school levels.

All data taken from: www.doe.mass.edu